This space takes inspiration from Gary Snyder's advice:
Stay together/Learn the flowers/Go light

Wednesday, 8 March 2023

Why human arrogance?

Arizona snow storm incident March, 2023
Arrogance can be found in many places today, and is a feeling that we are in total control of our lives and our destinies. But events that happen in all our lives constantly remind us just how fragile and contingent our existence really is.

Frank Doyle SJ

Tuesday, 7 March 2023

Gender ideology runs into reality

Here are useful resources for those seeking clarity as to why gender ideology is so catastrophic for society's well-being: 

Organizations that count

Don Quixote at death’s door


“Blessed be Almighty God, who has shown me such goodness. In truth his mercies are boundless, and the sins of men can neither limit them nor keep them back!” 

Tuesday, 28 February 2023

Writer takes delight in her close family

Sarah Standing, whose illness revealed the riches of her life
Stories from identities both recognisable and of the copycat type appear regularly lauding the fact that they are single or childless, with the theme that life is so much better that way. For newsgatherers, the views of such people are deemed worthy of a headline. Self-indulgence is welcomed as it provokes mainstream of society to rise up in defence of values that protect family and mutual care, and controversy means the revenue of the news source grows.

Salve for these wounds inflicted on the social body comes in the form of the evidence around us of parents boldly meeting the challenges of raising children, and of family members responding with devotion to the needs of each other. 

A British writer who was diagnosed with cancer has written a book detailing her treatment, but going to some length to highlight how her family — husband, children, grandchildren, and mother — played important roles in her recovery. The writer, Sarah Standing, was 61 when she was found to have cancer. Her book is Dancing With The Red Devil: A Memoir Of Love, Hope, Family And Cancer. 

The medical care was one thing, but her experience of  living through a time of desperate need has opened her eyes to what the loners by choice will never be able to enjoy.

Standing writes:

But I have learned things — big things. I always slightly mocked the trend for being grateful for everything, from a cup of coffee to a sunrise, but now I get it. I’m grateful. When I first got ill, I harboured such grand ideas about what I’d do if — no, scratch that, when — I recovered. But how quickly I’ve become indifferent to all the things I thought I wanted.

I fantasised about fancy family holidays in the Maldives, and big adventures. I projected myself forward into an imagined new lifestyle, one that bore no resemblance to the life I’d put on hold, only to realise I already had everything I ever wanted. The only thing that mattered was to release my children and husband from the tyranny of having to worry about me.

Now I have it back — that old, wonderful life — I see more clearly than ever that family is everything. More curative, more potent, than any drug they hit you with.

Standing elaborates on how each member of her family contributed to her recovery through their attention to her and their willingness to engage in her battle against cancer. Then she declares:

The truth is, it’s my family who carry the burden of my illness. For 14 months of treatment, I do exist in a sort of survival trance of denial, while they deal every day with the severity of my situation. And when the PET scan comes back clear at the end of that time, at last I can see just how they’ve held me up, kept me going, understood how much danger I was in, when I didn’t.

The antagonism toward the family more frequently expressed is disturbing to those who have the welfare of a future-focused society at heart. An example is a skit, here, by Chelsea Handler, an American comedian and TV celebrity.

A BBC feature highlights the social stigma related to childlessness. Clearly, society's disapproval of those who desire to be "free" to live their life without the restraints that child-rearing demands is a form of self-protection for the fundamental unit of society. Secondly, the projected disgrace is to de-incentivise anyone from withdrawing from the linkages of mutual support that produce a healthy community. 

From this second BBC feature we see the new set of values influencing those of the child-bearing generation to limit family size to the minimum.

We know from experience past and present that a weakening of family bonds causes confusion in the young and delinquency. 

[[[[[[

Potential Emotional and Behavioral Impact on Children
Kids from single-parent families are more likely to face emotional and behavioral health challenges — like aggression or engaging in high-risk behaviors — when compared to peers raised by married parents.
1 Aug 2022

[[[[[[

12 Aug 2021 — Children of single parents are more prone to various psychiatric illnesses, alcohol abuse, and suicide attempts than children from homes with ...
4 Aug 2020 — Here are some of the well-known risks for children growing up with a single mother compared to their peers in married-couple families: lower ...
[[[[[[
17 Nov 2017 — According to McLanahan and Sandefur, children of single-parent households are at increased risk of dropping out of high school. In the book's ...
[[[[[[
Meanwhile, the narcissism that is so apparent in the West is having its expected effect. Robert D. Putnam's Bowling Alone (2000) predicted social disorder erupting wherever
the individualism innate to consumerism and the sexual revolution takes hold.
[[[[[[
Asian families are battling to withstand the promotion of decayed Western values.

Leave a comment and, if you like this blog, read the same posts at my Peace and Truth newsletter on Substack, where you can subscribe for free and be notified when a new post is published.

Monday, 20 February 2023

God's love is weird, lunacy, a little crazy

From photo by Elīna Arāja
If someone slaps your face, turn the other cheek, Jesus says, which is a weird thing to suggest. But it's weird only if you think Jesus' Sermon on the Mount and his subsequent comments are a kind of political platform, says Bishop Robert Barron.
Here’s a key now to reading the Sermon on the Mount: we can’t read it as just one sort of moral philosophy among many. So, everyone from Plato and Aristotle all the way up through Kant and Hegel and John Dewey has a moral philosophy—here’s our understanding of how humans ought to behave. Or they have a political philosophy—here’s the way we think society ought to be organized.

That’s true, again, from Plato through Karl Marx and everybody in between. And they say, well, here’s Jesus’ ethical teaching, here’s Jesus’ political philosophy. That’s precisely the wrong way to read it.

Barron then stresses the distinction that has to be made between all the crowd of moral philosophers and political theorists and Jesus in the moral challenges thrown down:   

[The] one thing you’ll notice is no one sounds like Jesus. [...] Jesus, in fact, sounds a little bit crazy. Name another moral philosopher who says, “I say to you, offer no resistance to one who is evil.” 

“Anyone wants to go to law with you over your tunic, hand over your cloak as well.” This sounds like lunacy. And then, to press it, “You have heard it said, ‘You shall love your neighbor and hate your enemy.’ But I say to you, love your enemies.” 

Jesus "is not trading in ordinary moral thought here":
It’s something qualitatively different. What’s the key? [...] “Be perfect, as your heavenly Father is perfect.” 

What he’s interested in is divinization, that we become conformed to God’s way of being. The Church Fathers said “Deus fit homo ut homo fieret Deus”—God became man that we might become God. An extraordinary claim that goes right back to the earliest of the Church Fathers. The purpose of the Incarnation? God becomes one of us that human nature might be lifted up to share in God’s own life.

"Okay, if that’s the game," says Barron, then we need to know what God is like: 

But God is not a being in the world. God is the creative ground of all that exists. God is the unmoved mover. He’s the un-caused cause. That means his love is not predicated upon some cause extraneous to itself. I will love you because..., I will love you in the measure that..., I will love you under these conditions. Well, that’s how we creatures love each other, but that’s not how God operates.

God is love, we hear; that’s all he knows how to do. He doesn’t play the game of conditioned love, love parceled out, love in bits and pieces, my love if you love me. And we are meant to be perfect, as our heavenly Father is perfect.

"Turn the other cheek", "If someone demands that you carry their load for one mile, carry it for two miles". These are hard sayings because it is not what our instincts tell us. But, Barron stresses: 

It’s being said to us by the Son of God, who wants us not just to be just in some ordinary human sense. He wants us to be perfect, as the heavenly Father is perfect, the one who makes his sun to shine on the good and the bad alike.

Unconditional love: go to the video of Bishop Barron's homily for his insights in full into what Christ is asking of us ‒ to love as God loves.


  Leave a comment and, if you like this blog, read the same posts at my Peace and Truth newsletter on Substack, where you can subscribe for free and be notified when a new post is published.

Tuesday, 14 February 2023

Small. Helpless. Why not get rid of it?


A Modest Proposal

For preventing the children of poor people in Ireland,
from being a burden on their parents or country,
and for making them beneficial to the publick.
By Dr. Jonathan Swift
1729

Leave a comment and, if you like this blog, read the same posts at my Peace and Truth newsletter on Substack, where you can subscribe for free and be notified when a new post is published.

Down the rabbit hole of self-absorption

Anna Tarazevich

The individualism of the Renaissance, the dismemberment of man and his relations in the age of Enlightenment, and finally the subjective idealism of Kant, whereby our minds were taught to relinquish the objective thing, the trans-subjective reality, and to indulge in boundless subjectivism: these influences tore us from the moorings of our being. . . . We became imprisoned within the walls of our own selves. . . . The category “humanity” became foreign to our thought, and we thought and lived only in the category of self. 

— German scholar Karl Adam (1875–1966) Source

Leave a comment and, if you like this blog, read the same posts at my Peace and Truth newsletter on Substack, where you can subscribe for free and be notified when a new post is published.