This space takes inspiration from Gary Snyder's advice:
Stay together/Learn the flowers/Go light

Tuesday 28 February 2023

Writer takes delight in her close family

Sarah Standing, whose illness revealed the riches of her life
Stories from identities both recognisable and of the copycat type appear regularly lauding the fact that they are single or childless, with the theme that life is so much better that way. For newsgatherers, the views of such people are deemed worthy of a headline. Self-indulgence is welcomed as it provokes mainstream of society to rise up in defence of values that protect family and mutual care, and controversy means the revenue of the news source grows.

Salve for these wounds inflicted on the social body comes in the form of the evidence around us of parents boldly meeting the challenges of raising children, and of family members responding with devotion to the needs of each other. 

A British writer who was diagnosed with cancer has written a book detailing her treatment, but going to some length to highlight how her family — husband, children, grandchildren, and mother — played important roles in her recovery. The writer, Sarah Standing, was 61 when she was found to have cancer. Her book is Dancing With The Red Devil: A Memoir Of Love, Hope, Family And Cancer. 

The medical care was one thing, but her experience of  living through a time of desperate need has opened her eyes to what the loners by choice will never be able to enjoy.

Standing writes:

But I have learned things — big things. I always slightly mocked the trend for being grateful for everything, from a cup of coffee to a sunrise, but now I get it. I’m grateful. When I first got ill, I harboured such grand ideas about what I’d do if — no, scratch that, when — I recovered. But how quickly I’ve become indifferent to all the things I thought I wanted.

I fantasised about fancy family holidays in the Maldives, and big adventures. I projected myself forward into an imagined new lifestyle, one that bore no resemblance to the life I’d put on hold, only to realise I already had everything I ever wanted. The only thing that mattered was to release my children and husband from the tyranny of having to worry about me.

Now I have it back — that old, wonderful life — I see more clearly than ever that family is everything. More curative, more potent, than any drug they hit you with.

Standing elaborates on how each member of her family contributed to her recovery through their attention to her and their willingness to engage in her battle against cancer. Then she declares:

The truth is, it’s my family who carry the burden of my illness. For 14 months of treatment, I do exist in a sort of survival trance of denial, while they deal every day with the severity of my situation. And when the PET scan comes back clear at the end of that time, at last I can see just how they’ve held me up, kept me going, understood how much danger I was in, when I didn’t.

The antagonism toward the family more frequently expressed is disturbing to those who have the welfare of a future-focused society at heart. An example is a skit, here, by Chelsea Handler, an American comedian and TV celebrity.

A BBC feature highlights the social stigma related to childlessness. Clearly, society's disapproval of those who desire to be "free" to live their life without the restraints that child-rearing demands is a form of self-protection for the fundamental unit of society. Secondly, the projected disgrace is to de-incentivise anyone from withdrawing from the linkages of mutual support that produce a healthy community. 

From this second BBC feature we see the new set of values influencing those of the child-bearing generation to limit family size to the minimum.

We know from experience past and present that a weakening of family bonds causes confusion in the young and delinquency. 

[[[[[[

Potential Emotional and Behavioral Impact on Children
Kids from single-parent families are more likely to face emotional and behavioral health challenges — like aggression or engaging in high-risk behaviors — when compared to peers raised by married parents.
1 Aug 2022

[[[[[[

12 Aug 2021 — Children of single parents are more prone to various psychiatric illnesses, alcohol abuse, and suicide attempts than children from homes with ...
4 Aug 2020 — Here are some of the well-known risks for children growing up with a single mother compared to their peers in married-couple families: lower ...
[[[[[[
17 Nov 2017 — According to McLanahan and Sandefur, children of single-parent households are at increased risk of dropping out of high school. In the book's ...
[[[[[[
Meanwhile, the narcissism that is so apparent in the West is having its expected effect. Robert D. Putnam's Bowling Alone (2000) predicted social disorder erupting wherever
the individualism innate to consumerism and the sexual revolution takes hold.
[[[[[[
Asian families are battling to withstand the promotion of decayed Western values.

Leave a comment and, if you like this blog, read the same posts at my Peace and Truth newsletter on Substack, where you can subscribe for free and be notified when a new post is published.

Monday 20 February 2023

God's love is weird, lunacy, a little crazy

From photo by Elīna Arāja
If someone slaps your face, turn the other cheek, Jesus says, which is a weird thing to suggest. But it's weird only if you think Jesus' Sermon on the Mount and his subsequent comments are a kind of political platform, says Bishop Robert Barron.
Here’s a key now to reading the Sermon on the Mount: we can’t read it as just one sort of moral philosophy among many. So, everyone from Plato and Aristotle all the way up through Kant and Hegel and John Dewey has a moral philosophy—here’s our understanding of how humans ought to behave. Or they have a political philosophy—here’s the way we think society ought to be organized.

That’s true, again, from Plato through Karl Marx and everybody in between. And they say, well, here’s Jesus’ ethical teaching, here’s Jesus’ political philosophy. That’s precisely the wrong way to read it.

Barron then stresses the distinction that has to be made between all the crowd of moral philosophers and political theorists and Jesus in the moral challenges thrown down:   

[The] one thing you’ll notice is no one sounds like Jesus. [...] Jesus, in fact, sounds a little bit crazy. Name another moral philosopher who says, “I say to you, offer no resistance to one who is evil.” 

“Anyone wants to go to law with you over your tunic, hand over your cloak as well.” This sounds like lunacy. And then, to press it, “You have heard it said, ‘You shall love your neighbor and hate your enemy.’ But I say to you, love your enemies.” 

Jesus "is not trading in ordinary moral thought here":
It’s something qualitatively different. What’s the key? [...] “Be perfect, as your heavenly Father is perfect.” 

What he’s interested in is divinization, that we become conformed to God’s way of being. The Church Fathers said “Deus fit homo ut homo fieret Deus”—God became man that we might become God. An extraordinary claim that goes right back to the earliest of the Church Fathers. The purpose of the Incarnation? God becomes one of us that human nature might be lifted up to share in God’s own life.

"Okay, if that’s the game," says Barron, then we need to know what God is like: 

But God is not a being in the world. God is the creative ground of all that exists. God is the unmoved mover. He’s the un-caused cause. That means his love is not predicated upon some cause extraneous to itself. I will love you because..., I will love you in the measure that..., I will love you under these conditions. Well, that’s how we creatures love each other, but that’s not how God operates.

God is love, we hear; that’s all he knows how to do. He doesn’t play the game of conditioned love, love parceled out, love in bits and pieces, my love if you love me. And we are meant to be perfect, as our heavenly Father is perfect.

"Turn the other cheek", "If someone demands that you carry their load for one mile, carry it for two miles". These are hard sayings because it is not what our instincts tell us. But, Barron stresses: 

It’s being said to us by the Son of God, who wants us not just to be just in some ordinary human sense. He wants us to be perfect, as the heavenly Father is perfect, the one who makes his sun to shine on the good and the bad alike.

Unconditional love: go to the video of Bishop Barron's homily for his insights in full into what Christ is asking of us ‒ to love as God loves.


  Leave a comment and, if you like this blog, read the same posts at my Peace and Truth newsletter on Substack, where you can subscribe for free and be notified when a new post is published.

Tuesday 14 February 2023

Small. Helpless. Why not get rid of it?


A Modest Proposal

For preventing the children of poor people in Ireland,
from being a burden on their parents or country,
and for making them beneficial to the publick.
By Dr. Jonathan Swift
1729

Leave a comment and, if you like this blog, read the same posts at my Peace and Truth newsletter on Substack, where you can subscribe for free and be notified when a new post is published.

Down the rabbit hole of self-absorption

Anna Tarazevich

The individualism of the Renaissance, the dismemberment of man and his relations in the age of Enlightenment, and finally the subjective idealism of Kant, whereby our minds were taught to relinquish the objective thing, the trans-subjective reality, and to indulge in boundless subjectivism: these influences tore us from the moorings of our being. . . . We became imprisoned within the walls of our own selves. . . . The category “humanity” became foreign to our thought, and we thought and lived only in the category of self. 

— German scholar Karl Adam (1875–1966) Source

Leave a comment and, if you like this blog, read the same posts at my Peace and Truth newsletter on Substack, where you can subscribe for free and be notified when a new post is published.

Friday 10 February 2023

Where doctors harm children deliberately

Leave a comment and, if you like this blog, read the same posts at my Peace and Truth newsletter on Substack, where you can subscribe for free and be notified when a new post is published. 

Thursday 9 February 2023

Our battle with evil exposed in quake

Corruption leads to destruction ‒ Hatay, Turkey, February 8, 2023
Even after a century of war, terror and high-tech genocide, we are still inclined, in the Western world at least, to pretend to ourselves that the world has really become quite a pleasant place, with ‘evil’ merely a blip on the horizon with which we can deal easily enough.

However great the contrary evidence, this modern myth of the eradication of evil through ‘enlightenment’, leaving only a few minor mopping up operations (preferably in far-away places) before Utopia finally arrives, has taken such a hold on popular imagination that any idea of God having to do anything powerful and destructive to address the problem is regarded as far too drastic, far too dramatic. 

But none of the early Christians, and certainly not Jesus himself, would have colluded with this glossing over of the seriousness of evil. 

                                 — N.T. Wright in Revelation For Everyone (2011)

Leave a comment and, if you like this blog, read the same posts at my Peace and Truth newsletter on Substack, where you can subscribe for free and be notified when a new post is published.

Wednesday 8 February 2023

Humanity's arrogance slapped down at UN

Mr Guterres in Tripoli, Libya. UN Photo/Florencia Soto Niño
The secretary-general of the United Nations, António Guterres, is at the centre of the world's effort to maintain the well-being of every community and every person on this planet, our common home. When he expresses great fear at the outlook for our continued existence it warrants attention. That few news organisations bothered to cover his bitter diagnosis given before the UN General Assembly in New York this Monday says a lot about the lack of sensitivity of society's leaders toward those who challenge the world's prevailing arrogance, myopic ideologies and self-indulgent lifestyles.

Mr Guterres began:

Excellencies,

We have started 2023 staring down the barrel of a confluence of challenges unlike any other in our lifetimes.   

Wars grind on.   

The climate crisis burns on.

Extreme wealth and extreme poverty rage on. 

The gulf between the haves and have nots is cleaving societies, countries and our wider world. 

Epic geopolitical divisions are undermining global solidarity and trust.  

This path is a dead end.  

We need a course correction.  

As a vivid judgement on humanity he cites the example of the Doomsday Clock:

That symbolic clock was created 76 years ago by atomic scientists, including Albert Einstein. Year after year, experts have measured humanity’s proximity to midnight – in other words, to self-destruction.

In 2023, they surveyed the state of the world – with the Russian invasion of Ukraine, the runaway climate catastrophe, rising nuclear threats that are undermining global norms and institutions.  

And they came to a clear conclusion. The Doomsday Clock is now 90 seconds to midnight, which means 90 seconds to total global catastrophe.

This is the closest the clock has ever stood to humanity’s darkest hour – and closer than even during the height of the Cold War. 

In truth, the Doomsday Clock is a global alarm clock.  We need to wake up – and get to work.  

The manner of behaviour promoted by some ideologies, institutions and political leaders are not only self-defeating but also immoral, Mr Guterres says:

The good news is that we know how to turn things around – on climate, on finance, on conflict resolution, on and on.  And we know that the costs of inaction far exceed the costs of action. But the strategic vision – the long-term thinking and commitment – is missing.   

Politicians and decisionmakers are hobbled by what I call a preference for the present.  There is a bias in political and business life for the short-term. The next poll.  The next tactical political maneuver to cling to power.  But also the next business cycle – or even the next day’s stock price.  

The future is someone else’s problem. This near-term thinking is not only deeply irresponsible – it is immoral. And it is self-defeating.   

What is immoral, sinful from a religious perspective, will by its very nature be opposed to true human well-being. Pope Francis, in his encyclical letters to world has implored everyone to welcome rather than despise the bonds that tie us together. His encyclicals have been described this way:
In 2015, Pope Francis completed the encyclical Laudato Si’ on May 24 on the care for our common home which has been foundational for Catholics in relation to listening to the cry of the earth and the cry of the poor, highlighting that all of creation is interconnected and emphasizing climate change and the acceleration and injustice of the ecological crisis and climate emergency. 

The most recent encyclical issued by Pope Francis on October 3, 2020, was Fratelli Tutti on fraternity and social friendship, in a global context of uncertainty due to the Covid 19 pandemic. 

Mr Guterres stresses the need to go back to the civilizational heritage that the Universal Declaration of Human Rights expresses:

Excellencies, we have an obligation to act – in deep and systemic ways. After all, the world is not moving incrementally. Technology is not moving incrementally. Climate destruction is not moving incrementally. We cannot move incrementally. This is not a time for tinkering.  It is a time for transformation.  

A transformation grounded in everything that guides our work – starting with the UN Charter [the foundational treaty signed on June 26, 1945] and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. This year marks the 75th anniversary of the Universal Declaration – the distillation of our shared mission to uphold and uplift our common humanity.  

It was bold, ambitious and audacious. We need to take inspiration from its spirit and its substance. The Declaration reminds us that the “inherent dignity and equal and inalienable rights of all members of the human family is the foundation of freedom, justice and peace.”  When I look at human rights in the broadest sense – with a 21st Century lens – I see a roadmap out of the dead end.

To work for peace is the first step because the shame of humanity is that "two billion people who live in countries affected by conflict and humanitarian crises".  

Excellencies, if every country fulfilled its obligations under the Charter, the right to peace would be guaranteed. When countries break those pledges, they create a world of insecurity for everyone. 

So it is time to transform our approach to peace by recommitting to the Charter -- putting human rights and dignity first, with prevention at the heart. That requires a holistic view of the peace continuum that identifies root causes and prevents the seeds of war from sprouting. 

The nuclear threat has become real again with the war in Ukraine:

It is also time to bring disarmament and arms control back to the centre – reducing strategic threats from nuclear arms and working for their ultimate elimination.

Nuclear-armed countries must renounce the first use of these unconscionable weapons. In fact, they must renounce any use, anytime, anywhere. The so-called “tactical” use of nuclear weapons is an absurdity. 

We are at the highest risk in decades of a nuclear war that could start by accident or design. We need to end the threat posed by 13,000 nuclear weapons held in arsenals around the world.  

At the same time, no Agenda for Peace can ignore the dangers posed by new technologies. It should include such measures as international bans on cyberattacks on civilian infrastructure, and internationally agreed limits on lethal autonomous weapons systems. Human agency must be preserved at all costs.  

The world's financial system shows how poor-sighted societies are through a lack of moral vision: 

Let’s be clear. 

When we see poverty and hunger on the rise around the world….

When developing countries are forced to pay five times more in borrowing costs than advanced economies … 

When vulnerable middle-income countries are denied concessional funding and debt relief…

When the richest 1 percent have captured almost half of all new wealth over the past decade… 

When people are hired and fired at will, but lack any form of social protection…

When we see all these gaping flaws and more…

Something is fundamentally wrong with our economic and financial system. 

He continues: 

 The global financial architecture is at the heart of the problem.  It should be the means through which globalization benefits all. Yet it is failing. The global financial architecture does not need a simple evolution; it needs a radical transformation. 

It is time for a [...] new commitment to place the dramatic needs of developing countries at the centre of every decision and mechanism of the global financial system. 

A new resolve to address the appalling inequalities and injustices laid bare once again by the pandemic and the response.

A new determination to ensure developing countries have a far greater voice in global financial institutions. 

And a new debt architecture that encompasses debt relief and restructuring to vulnerable countries, including middle-income ones in need [...]. 

Without fundamental reforms, the richest countries and individuals will continue to pile up wealth, leaving crumbs for the communities and countries of the Global South. 

Mr Guterres' desperation over the world's ignoring the threats to human survival is clear when he points to "fossil fuel producers and their enablers scrambling to expand production and raking in monster profits", this in a week when leading oil companies have reported record profits and a reluctance to forge ahead with renewable sources of energy. It is for that kind of reason, he says:

We must end the merciless, relentless, and senseless war on nature. It is putting our world at immediate risk of hurtling past the 1.5-degree temperature increase limit and now still moving towards a deadly 2.8 degrees. 

Meanwhile, humanity is taking a sledgehammer to our world’s rich biodiversity – with brutal and even irreversible consequences for people and planet. Our ocean is choked by pollution, plastics and chemicals. And vampiric overconsumption is draining the lifeblood of our planet – water. 

This is the year of reckoning: "No more excuses. No more greenwashing. No more bottomless greed of the fossil fuel industry and its enablers." The suggested immorality of the greed of managers and investors is coupled in Mr Guterres' plea with his call for the end to deceitful clean and green claims with regards products but also the heralding of what in reality are "fake carbon credits". 

Respect for each other is a further moral quality that Mr Guterres deems necessary to draw to our attention. He calls on "Governments, regulators, policymakers, technology companies, the media, civil society", with the last including individuals. Our moral obligation, personal as well as civic, is this:

Stop the hate. Set up strong guardrails. Be accountable [...].

All this is familiar territory for those imbued with an understanding of the history of the UN Charter and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, where Judeo-Christian concepts of how God-given dignity of each person demands respect for their rights and freedom were carried into those documents that were meant to lay the foundation for the world society after two horrific world wars and where communism loomed as a dark cloud over eastern Europe. 

In his 2015 letter Laudato Si' Pope Francis writes:

Sobriety and humility were not favourably regarded in the last century. And yet, when there is a general breakdown in the exercise of a certain virtue in personal and social life, it ends up causing a number of imbalances, including environmental ones. [...]

Once we lose our humility and become enthralled with the possibility of limitless mastery over everything, we inevitably end up harming society and the environment. 

It is not easy to promote this kind of healthy humility or happy sobriety when we consider ourselves autonomous, when we exclude god from our lives or replace him with our own ego, and think that our subjective feelings can define what is right and what is wrong.

A humble attitude toward other people and our common home, an attitude arising from the knowledge of the evil in our own heart, as Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn pointed out, is expressed powerfully in a prayer Francis offers at the end of his letter: 

A prayer for our earth

All-powerful God, you are present in the whole universe

and in the smallest of your creatures.

You embrace with your tenderness all that exists.

Pour upon us the power of your love,

that we may protect life and beauty.

Fill us with peace, that we may live

as brothers and sisters, harming no one.

O God of the poor,

help us to rescue the abandoned and forgotten of this earth,

so precious in your eyes.

Bring healing to our lives, that we may protect the world and not prey on it,

that we may sow beauty, not pollution and destruction.

Touch the hearts

of those who look only for gain

at the expense of the poor and the earth.

Teach us to discover the worth of each thing,

to be filled with awe and contemplation,

to recognise that we are profoundly united with every creature

as we journey toward your infinite light.

We thank you for being with us each day.

Encourage us, we pray, in our struggle for justice, love and peace.

Leave a comment and, if you like this blog, read the same posts at my Peace and Truth newsletter on Substack, where you can subscribe for free and be notified when a new post is published.

Sunday 5 February 2023

The Creator’s lavish love

 

Galaxies can contain as many as 100 trillion stars. Astronomers believe there are about 170 billion galaxies in our universe.