This space takes inspiration from Gary Snyder's advice:
Stay together/Learn the flowers/Go light

Sunday 25 September 2011

Wild Flowers


I enjoy looking at woodprints of wildlife because they draw the eye to every little detail of what the artist is focusing on. Recently I have taken delight in the work of the artist whose piece I have displayed here.

Yasuo Kuniyoshi (United States, born Japan, 1889-1953), Wild Flowers, 1922, pen and ink, ink and wash on paper, 17 5/8 x 12 inches. Wadsworth Atheneum Museum of Art, Gift of William E. Hill, 1959.17.
http://www.einspruch.com/journal/2010/08/16/the-lanes-whom-you-loved-is-not-here


   Another piece that attracted my interest is this, the source of which I have not been able to track down, but which expresses a clear Chinese spirit. Upon discovering the cricket, the heart gives a leap for joy.  

Saturday 24 September 2011

With every beat of the wing

Among the weeds at the side of small lake in Binh Duong province, Vietnam, colourful flowers stand out. And, yes, there's the equivalent of a bumble bee heading for the source of its own well-being. (My photo)

Saturday 13 August 2011

The Lotus Life Cycle

A copycat artist's rendering of an original Vietnamese work
The people of Vietnam regard the lotus (Nelumbo nucifera) as one of the four graceful flowers and plants, along with the pine, bamboo, and chrysanthemum. Known as the ‘flower of the dawn’, the lotus is found throughout the country at lakes and ponds. To the Vietnamese, the lotus is the symbol of purity, commitment and optimism for the future. The elegance of the lotus is often cited in  folk songs and poems.

Most Vietnamese observe some form of Buddhism, and in Buddhist symbolism  the lotus represents purity of body, speech, and mind, floating above the muddy waters of attachment and desire. The Buddha is often depicted sitting on a giant lotus leaf or blossom. According to legend, he was born with the ability to walk immediately and everywhere he stepped, lotus flowers bloomed.

The lotus and the lily, pictured here, have a major difference in that the lotus's leaves rise out of the water (below), and as described here - but see more on the family feud below. 
The lotus has a use even as it dies. Its seeds 
are collected and can be used as a food or beverage.
This depiction of the last days of a lotus
is part of a work by Ha Huynh My, whose
works are in private collections in many countries.
For a long time, there was confusion among taxonomists regarding the relationship of lotus (Nelumbo) and water- lily (Nymphaea). But using DNA evidence along with other taxonomic studies, researchers now agree that lotus and water-lily belong to two different families. In fact, studies have shown that whereas lotus is a member of the more evolved group of plants known as the 'Eudicots', water-lily is a member of a primitive group (Nympheales) that occurred as early as the cretaceous period. The lotus plant is more closely related to Platanus or the sycamore also known as the plane tree and the members of the family Proteaceae!! A closer look by botanists revealed many similar features in the floral and vegetative morphologies between the members of lotus, sycamore and proteas. (From Simple Expressions: The World of Flowers)

Nature's riches

Sunlight, oil on canvas, by Bich Nguyet, who presented this work at a 1999 exhibition in Ho Chi Minh City, her hometown. Her exhibits often featured textures that highlighted natural variations, and a colour wash, as with Sunlight, that spurred a fresh interest in the subject matter.

Friday 22 July 2011

Our companions

Umbrella Bird 


 "Acrosoma arcuatum"

Date 1863 (publication of first edition)
Scanned from The Naturalist on the River Amazons by Henry Walter Bates, University of California Press version, published 1962.

These images are in the public domain because its copyright has expired. This applies to Australia, the European Union and those countries with a copyright term of life of the author plus 70 years.The United States public domain tag indicates why this work is in the public domain in the United States. Note that a few countries have copyright terms longer than 70 years: Mexico has 100 years, Colombia has 80 years, and Guatemala and Samoa have 75 years. This image may not be in the public domain in these countries, which moreover do not implement the rule of the shorter term. Côte d'Ivoire has a general copyright term of 99 years and Honduras has 75 years, but they do implement the rule of the shorter term.

Thursday 21 July 2011

Picasso needed redemption, too

Picasso was a "control freak", and he loved the benefits of fame and wealth. He was a free spirit in his art and morality. However, his manner of behaving had its consequences in his personal life. As with his mistresses and the children from them, there was much tragedy and heartbreak among his wives and children, extending down to his grandchildren.

This element of the artist's life comes out in a discussion the BBC's Zeinab Badawi had with the artist's friend and biographer John Richardson, and grandson Bernard Ruiz Picasso. Richardson says Picasso was wonderful to his friends but very controlling within the family. "He liked his women to be submissive, and when he had finished with them he took it out on their children," a BBC trailer on the discussion reports.

It goes on: "Bernard tells Zeinab that although he was fond of his grandfather, he realises that Picasso sometimes had strange reactions to members of his family." The contradictions in the great artist's life come out also in the series uploaded on YouTube.

A free spirit, yes, but as a flawed man, a slave to his own whims and drives.

Sunday 17 July 2011

To Wonder At

Though I follow closely what is reported about the wonders of what lies beyond this planet, the immensity of the universe continues to amaze me. In the past week I had to express a mental “Wow!” at a BBC story about the four galaxy clusters that go by the combined name of Pandora. The element of reporter Jason Palmer’s story that amazed me was not the almost incomprehensible concept of dark matter that was point of the account, but the size of everything. Palmer says: “Galaxy clusters are the largest structures we know of in the Universe, comprising hundreds of galaxies and trillions of stars - along with huge amounts of hot gas - and dark matter.”
The image of the Pandora cluster shows haphazardly scattered galaxies,
hot gas (false-coloured red)  and dark matter (blue) - BBC
To put that “trillions of stars” into perspective I went to one of the NASA websites NASA websites, which has these details about our own Milky Way: “The Milky Way is a gravitationally bound collection of roughly a hundred billion stars. Our sun is one of these stars and is located roughly 24,000 light years from the center of our Milky Way.”  That brought me up against another massive number – a  light-year is thedistance light travels in one year -  at the rate of 186,000 miles per second, or about six trillion miles: 6,000,000,000,000 miles.  That translates into approximately 10 trillion kilometers, or 300,000 kilometers a second.
COBE image of the Milky Way (Courtesy of Ned Wright), from the NASA website

NASA says the Milky Way galaxy has three major components:
    “A thin disk consisting of young and intermediate age stars - this disk also contains gas and is actively forming new stars. Dust in the disk makes it appear orange in the picture. Dust absorbs blue light more than red light and thus makes stars appear reddish. Our galaxy has spiral arms in its disk - these spiral arms are regions of active star formation.
   " A bar of older stars (white in the COBE picture).
   " An extended dark halo whose composition is unknown. Since the matter in the halo does not consist of luminous stars, it does not show up in the COBE image. The existence of the dark halo is inferred from its gravitational pull on the visible matter.”

The wonder of it all! However some people don’t bother to try to grasp this immensity, and others say “It’s big, but so what?” There’s more, too. I can’t see how all this is simply inevitable based on the belief that because gravity existed the Big Bang had to occur as a natural consequence.  How is it that a law of gravity should be proposed as an uncaused phenomenon when all our knowledge and experience is that there must a cause for everything ­- except God. 

The key idea is: "Because there is a law such as gravity, the universe can and will create itself from nothing." What an astounding jump in logic! The issue is kept in perspective by the results of a poll at The Guardian in Britain shown at the end of its article on Professor Hawking's latest book.